Paramedics must be aware of their own personal biases or preconceived ideas of disability; these are sometimes referred to as unconscious biases. Undergraduate students who study ethics in nursing have an opportunity during their clinical practice, to discuss and reflect on a range of ethical and moral actions. Despite this, there remain multiple barriers to their fully effective provision of such care. practice with medical specialists. T1 - Ethics and law in paramedic practice, T2 - Boundaries of capacity and interests. Paramedics should be able to find good solutions to these dilemmas, but they have not received much attention . Some people with a disability may only be capable of autonomy in choices about low acuity or minor treatment, but not about more serious conditions. As such, John was assessed using the MCA (Department of Health, 2005) to ensure that he had the capability and right to make his own decisions. Paramedics must deliver appropriate clinical care within the boundaries of the law, clinical guidelines and evidence-based standards. In the case of paramedicine, both ethics and law should remain unprejudiced and objective. They must also deliver care that is consistent with ethical standards and respectful of the expectations, preferences and beliefs of the patient. The paramedics should take into account the health conditions of patients, the seriousness of their problem, their relations with relatives, and probable reactions to different types of treatment before making the final decision. While the second article in this series (Carver et al, 2020) discussed mental illness where it related to end-of-life care and self-harm, it should be remembered that patient vulnerability can exist in those with chronic mental illness over their lifetime. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers face many ethical issues while providing prehospital care to children and adults. All of these ethical issues represent significant dilemmas to consider for the sake of patients health as well as moral and legal justification (Bledsoe, Porter, Cherry, & Armacost, 2006). The ambulance crew's concerns for John's welfare prompted them to assess his level of risk to self and others. keywords = "Ethics, Decision making, paramedic, complexity". This case report highlights the potential difficulties and complications associated with the management of mental health incidents for ambulance crews (Parsons and O'Brien, 2011) as well as how potentially confusing the ethical and legal aspects are when managing mental health conditions that require some involuntary form of treatment (Townsend and Luck, 2009). There is currently some debate as to whether the police are the most suitable personnel to be detaining patients under the MHA for a variety of reasons, and paramedics are mentioned as a potential alternative group to utilise this law in the future (Department of Health, 2014). For example, older patients may experience an acute delirium from an infection that temporarily renders their capacity limited, or may lose capacity permanently because of progressive illnesses such as dementia. It shall conclude with this student's position on the issue based on the discussions. Therefore, consideration of these effects is part of how they treat patients and make decisions. It concerns the application of four principles: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. As a result, it is possible to observe a contradiction between the notion of personal autonomy and medical intervention. The beneficence of paramedical practices includes not only the treatment and medicines but also relative education and information. Introduction. 4 Conducting ethical research in paramedic practice. Therefore, they should consider the needs and requirements of patients and act correspondingly. In order to begin to discuss some of these complexities, a case report will be presented to allow exploration of the challenges paramedics may face when trying to manage patients presenting with mental health conditions that require treatment but are refusing aid against advice. A major concern in healthcare ethics (including within paramedicine) is the protection of vulnerable persons within the realms of patient-practitioner interactions (Moritz, 2017; Townsend, 2017; Ebbs and Carver, 2019). If a person is then deemed to have capacity and continues to refuse care, paramedics are forced to balance their duty to protect life against the patient's right to make autonomous decisions (Hodgson, 2016). A key assumption of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA, 2005), is that a person has capacity until proved otherwise. People with a disability may have difficulty advocating for themselves because of communication issues or their disability may affect their understanding of healthcare considerations. Adult patients are presumed to have capacity to make medical decisions so treating them against their will violates their autonomy. The crew's assessments and thought processes surrounding the management of John will be discussed. However, ethical issues relating to vulnerability and the treatment of children extend well beyond Gillick competence. The design of the PARAMEDIC-2 trial required paramedics to independently determine eligibility and randomise patients into the trial by administering the blinded drugs (either adrenaline or a saline placebo) from a trial-specific drug pack. Insufficient competence or lack of basic knowledge can lead to harmful effects and negative consequences of treatment. A person is not to be treated as unable to make a decision unless all practicable steps to help him to do so have been taken without success. A. 2011). Paramedic ethics, capacity and the treatment of vulnerable patients Paramedic ethics, capacity and the treatment of vulnerable patients Dominique Moritz, Phillip Ebbs, Hamish Carver Wednesday, December 2, 2020 Vulnerable patients are at an increased risk of harm or exploitation in healthcare. Currently, few published research or evidence-based texts exist, specifically in relation to prehospital care. Additionally, according to the current laws, all patients have the right to control their lives without any external interventions, control, and management. Other sections of the MHA can be utilised to remove a person from their property but require further input from other professionals ranging from magistrates to psychiatric doctors and approved mental health professionals (see appendix 2). Paramedics are required to make these decisions within settings that are often disordered, uncontrolled and unpredictable, where all the relevant information and circumstances are not fully known. The patient, who will be called John for confidentiality purposes, presented to the ambulance service with an altered mental state. For many, staying at home is an important consideration in their decisions; older people may only wish to receive care that can be delivered in their home. The primary task of paramedics is to provide opportune and unprejudiced services, correlating them with legal regulations. While invasive options may be necessary for the safety of the patient, the clinician and the broader community in some circumstances, they should be used only as a last resort and less invasive treatment options should be preferred where possible, such as voluntary transport to hospital or a community referral. Major incident clinical . From this standpoint, paramedics play a significant role in consideration of ethical issues and bear responsibility for the preservation of both legal and moral standards in every individual case of interaction with the patients. Gillick competence addresses children's understanding and provides paramedics and other health professionals with a means to determine the extent of involvement a child should have in decisions that affect their healthcare. More specifically, how should they navigate these situations in the presence of complexities such as diminished mental capacity and end-of-life care? While the ethical tenets apply to the moral aspect of practices, the legal ones help legally arrange them. Sign up to Journal of Paramedic Practices regular newsletters and keep up-to-date with the very latest clinical research and CPD we publish each month. It seems paramount that whichever decision is made and Act is used, should the patient receive any form of involuntary treatment, the principles of the MCA and the MHA are upheld, and any decision made is in the patients best interest (Department of Health, 2005). Ethical issues are closely intertwined with legal aspects of care and this module will therefore consider the four ethical principles, focusing on the two key principles of autonomy and . A person may be deprived of their civil liberties in order to be provided with care or treatment that they are unable to consent to due to a lack of capacity, if is in their best interests (Ministry of Justice, 2008; Amblum, 2014). D. personal safety. The ethics in paramedicine has become a field of interest for many scientists and researchers. Non-maleficence is the sister to beneficence and is often considered as an inseparable pillar of ethics. Although ethical and legal conduct and practices are often in harmony, in many areas ethical principles and the issues surrounding medical liability appear to come into conflict. Their vulnerability may impede their autonomy, which can then affect their ability to self-advocate. There are particular ethical challenges when multiple vulnerable groups are involved, such as when a mental health patient is also a parent or is caring for an older person. The tenet of justice presupposes that paramedicine practitioners should treat all patients equally, without showing personal evaluations and attitudes. 1. be able to practise safely and effectively within their scope of practice 2. be able to practise within the legal and ethical boundaries of their profession 3. be able to maintain fitness to practise 4. be able to practise as an autonomous professional, exercising their own professional judgement A patient who is treated by paramedics may be vulnerable because they lack the capacity to consent to treatment or, if they do have the capacity to consent to treatment, they lack the ability (or avenues) to express their worries about that treatment, or to defend themselves in circumstances where their consent has been misinterpreted. For example, in England and Wales under section 74 of the Serious Crimes Act 2015, health professionals have a legal duty to notify the police if they discover female genital mutilation. Autonomy is an important healthcare principle because it ensures a person maintains control over decisions relating to their healthcare. Many with intellectual or communication disabilities are able to live independently in the community and make autonomous choices about their healthcare. However, children's life experiences, maturity and understanding differ from one individual to the nextdepending on factors such as their age, culture, health, upbringing, background and environmentsand their ability to process healthcare-related information also varies. In other words, the paramedicine practitioners should inform the patients about all the probable effects of treatment as well as explain its moral and ethical issues. This research aims to highlight and explore underlying values present within practice-based decisions. To get things started, we give a rundown of the most recent research on ethical issues in sports medicine.